Legality of Sea: Towards A New Methodology

Konpal Kaur; Shikha Sharma

doi:10.51611/iars.irj.v16i1.2026.275

Authors

Konpal Kaur Georgia State University (Atlanta)
Shikha Sharma Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (Delhi)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51611/iars.irj.v16i1.2026.275

Keywords:

Underwater Cultural Heritage, Marine Archaeology, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, International Convention

Abstract

This Article explores the intersection of legal frameworks and archaeological practices in protecting underwater cultural heritage (UCH), focusing on historic shipwrecks. It traces maritime law from medieval European customs treating wrecks as res nullius or subject to royal claims to modern regimes like the 1982 UNCLOS and 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (CPUCH). UNCLOS is critiqued for its fragmented provisions (Articles 149 and 303), which offer limited protection and often prioritize commercial salvage over heritage preservation, enabling treasure hunting in EEZs and high seas. The UNESCO Convention provides a stronger framework by mandating professional archaeological standards, in-situ preservation and rejecting commercial exploitation.

Case studies, the successful public preservation of the Mary Rose (UK), commercial salvages like the Atocha (USA), destructive looting of the Geldermalsen and state-sanctioned exploitation of a Chinese wreck in Indonesia highlight how legal ambiguities and economic pressures disproportionately affect developing nations. The article entails a balanced model for poorer states, temporary "loaning" agreements with capable parties for excavation, exhibition and tourism revenue generation, allowing cost recovery before reverting control to the country of origin. This aims to ensure financial sustainability, equitable heritage protection and prevention of loss to unregulated salvage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boesten, E. 2002. Archaeological and/or historic valuable shipwrecks in international waters: public international law and what it offers. The Hague: TMCAsser.

Bell, C.E., Paterson, R.K., & ebrary, Inc eds. 2009. Protection of First Nations cultural heritage: laws, policy and reform. Vancouver: UBC Press.

Blake, J.E. 2015. International cultural heritage law. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Cunningham, R.B. 1999. Archaeology, relics and the law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

Carman, J. 1996. Valuing ancient things: archaeology and law. London: Leicester University Press.

Dromgoole, S. 2013. Underwater cultural heritage and international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Flatman, J. 2009. Conserving Marine Cultural Heritage: Threats, Risks and Future Priorities. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11(1): p.5–8.

Flecker, M. 2001. A Ninth-Century AD Arab or Indian Shipwreck in Indonesia: First Evidence for Direct Trade with China. World Archaeology 32(3): p.335–354.

Forrest, C. 2010. International law and the protection of cultural heritage. London: Routledge.

Gribble, J., Parham, D., & Scott-Ireton, D. 2009. Historic Wrecks: Risks or Resources? Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11(1): p.16–28.

Gardiner, J., Allen, M.J., Alburger, M.A., & Mary Rose Trust. 2005. Before the mast: life and death aboard the Mary Rose. Portsmouth: Mary Rose Trust.

Human, H. Democratising world heritage: The policies and practices of community involvement in Turkey. Journal of social archaeology 15(2): p.160.

Harrison, R. 2012. Heritage. Milton Park, Abingdon; New York: Routledge.

Heath, C., Kamperman Sanders, A., Max-Planck-Institute für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, U.W., Instituto de Estudos Europeus de Macau, & Universiteit Maastricht. 2005. New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indications, enforcement, overprotection. Oxford: Hart.

Human, H. Democratising world heritage: The policies and practices of community involvement in Turkey. Journal of social archaeology 15(2): p.160.

Hauser-Schäublin, B., & Prott, L.V. eds. 2016. Cultural Property and Contested Ownership: The Trafficking of Artefacts and the Quest for Restitution. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Jörg, C.J.A. 1986. The Geldermalsen: history and porcelain. Groningen: Kemper Publishers.

Márquez-Grant, N., & Fibiger, L. 2011. The Routledge handbook of archaeological human remains and legislation: an international guide to laws and practice in the excavation and treatment of archaeological human remains. London: Routledge

Miller, H.C. 1973. International law and marine archaeology. Belmont, Mass: Academy of Applied Science.

Marsden, P.R.V., McElvogue, D., & Mary Rose Trust. 2009. The Mary Rose: your noblest shippe: anatomy of a Tudor warship. Portsmouth: Mary Rose Trust.

Marsden, P.R.V. 2003. Sealed by time: the loss and recovery of the Mary Rose. Portsmouth: Mary Rose Trust.

Maarleveld, T.J. 2011. Ethics, Underwater Cultural Heritage and International Law. The Oxford Handbook of Maritime Archaeology: p.917–941.

Miller, George L.. “The Second Destruction of the Geldermalsen”. Historical Archaeology 26.4 (1992): 124–131.

Marvin, W. 1858. A treatise on the law of wreck and salvage [electronic resource]. Boston: Little, Brown

Meijers, H. 1967. The nationality of ships. The Hague: MartinusNijhoff.

O’Keefe, P.J. 2002. Shipwrecked heritage: a commentary on the UNESCO Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage. Leicester, England: Institute of Art and Law.

Nafziger, J.A.R., & Paterson, R.K. 2014. Handbook on the law of cultural heritage and international trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pugh-Smith, J. 1996. Archaeology in law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Roberts, P. 2002. Taking to the water: English Heritage’s initial policy for the management of maritime archaeology in England. London: English Heritage.

Rule, M. 1982. The Mary Rose: the excavation and raising of Henry VIII’s flagship. London: Conway Maritime Press.

Steffy, J.R. 1994. Wooden ship building and the interpretation of shipwrecks. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

Skeates, R., McDavid, C., & Carman, J. 2012. The Oxford handbook of public archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Spoerry, P. 1993. Archaeology and legislation in Britain. Hertford: Rescue.

Strate, A. 1995. The protection of the underwater cultural heritage: an emerging objective of the contemporary law of the sea. The Hague; London: MartinusNijhoff.

Van Meurs, L.H. 1985. Legal aspects of marine archaeological research. Cape Town: Institute of Marine Law, University of Cape Town